Juvenile Justice Essays

Juvenile Justice Essays Juvenile Justice Essay Juvenile Justice Essay The Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Adult tribunal system have many simalities and differences. While the Juvenile Justice system is more concerned with rehabilitation of the Juvenile so he wont contine with more offense when he become an grownup. the grownup tribunal sytem is looking expression to penalize the grownups with more rough clip. and effects. They portion similarlites such as procedural precautions to protect their rights and besides they both have the right to councel to assist support they self. Even though both tribunal system are ment to rehabilate and penalize or detour condemnable from more crimal behaviour we need they both to maintain America safe and to contine our chase of felicity. The juvenile justness system and the grownup justness system portion their commonalties and differences. For illustration. the juvenile justness system makes it the point to rehabilitate alternatively of penalizing juvenile delinquents. However. one must take into consideration that penalty is still a executable construct within the juvenile system. but it is used providentially as a last resort. In cases of penalty for a adolescent who is accused of an flagitious offense. he or she may be tried as an grownup ( Goldstein. 2007 ) . Harmonizing to Dr. Goldstein ( 2007 ) there are some similarities between the two justness systems as he states that the constabularies. bench. and corrections have discretion relation to determination devising in both systems. For those grownups and juveniles that admit guilt there is a system of procedural precautions to protect their rights. Additionally. other commonalties between the age separated groups include supplication bargaining. every bit good as the right to hearings and entreaties. However. when grownups are tried for offenses. they are tried in the grownup tribunal. while juveniles are tried in the juvenile tribunal. Other differences exist. as Goldstein ( 2007 ) further provinces that juvenile proceedings are non viewed as condemnable. and that juvenile records. tribunal hearings. etc. are confidential and non usually accessible ; grownup records are public. Most juveniles receive probation after strong belief and the juvenile system in entire is much like the intermediate countenances of grownup corrections. Once a juvenile wrongdoer is placed on probation he/she will be ordered to take part in some educational. guidance or damages plans while on probation. Probation officers attend the schools the juveniles attend. to minimise the potency for more condemnable activity ( Clear T. Cole G. Reisig M. 2009 ) . The juvenile correctional system warrants and receives more attending than the grownup systems. Why non nip offense in the butt when it is present in younger wrongdoers to minimise the potency of future felons? When immature kids see that they have clip to reform and populate a better life. I believe for the most portion they will. Both juveniles and grownups have the right to advocate in tribunal proceedings. Nevertheless. juveniles may be represented by tribunal appointed advocators who look out for the juvenile’s best involvement. as a parent would for his or her kid ; with right ways to assist the kid rehabilitate. In the instance of grownup tests. tribunal appointed advocators may be stand foring the accused. but the best interest lies in cut downing or predating the sentence. non rehabilitate ( Goldstein. 2007 ) . In the instances of both groups. a traditional advocate may be hired to stand for the person While due procedure is given to all ( juveniles and grownups likewise ) . juvenile wrongdoers seem to be helped out more than grownup wrongdoers. Besides. kids tried as juveniles can non be sentenced to adult gaols or prisons. There are many arguments over these and the other aforesaid patterns. with critics and advocates on all issues. but I personally think the system is good and it can merely acquire better with clip.